An excerpt from a document circulating on social media shows that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) intends to set listing standards for a new class of exchange-traded products. XRP may be listed alongside Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and Litecoin as qualified digital commodities. However, this material has not yet been independently verified by mainstream media.
The message comes from an independent account.
The first to disclose relevant information was the crypto news account RippleXity. This account claims to be an independent community news platform built on XRP Ledger and clearly states that it has no association with Ripple and Ripple Labs.
The existing information indicates that the leaked documents are described as part of the proposed rules for SEC, but public reports have not yet confirmed the original text of the documents, the submission path, or their authenticity. This also means that whether XRP has been officially incorporated into the standards remains at a stage that has not undergone independent verification.
Involves adjustment of the ETF asset range
According to the circulating information, this new standard may clarify the definition of "digital goods" and provide a clearer framework for access to a new category of exchange-traded products.
- XRP is mentioned to be on par with BTC, ETH, SOL, and LTC.
- The upper limit for non-standard asset allocation is reportedly 15% of the net value.
- Product strategies are said to include proactive management.
Market attention to SEC caliber changes
If the relevant information is ultimately confirmed to be true, the market's focus will be on whether SEC will begin to define the commodity attributes of certain crypto assets in a more explicit manner, and whether this will affect the subsequent product design of ETF.
For XRP, the attention paid to the inclusion in the list of qualified products mainly stems from the potential impact on its compliance product path in the US market. However, based on the currently available public information, there is still a lack of formal documents and broader sources of support for these developments.
