Ethereum: Summer.fi attacked, approximately $6 million worth of DAI stolen.
U.Today
07-06 16:45
Ai Focus
Summer.fi's vault was manipulated by a flash loan, resulting in the theft of approximately $6 million in DAI. The team has suspended the relevant contracts.
Helpful
No.Help

An automated vault operated by the Ethereum multi-chain protocol Summer.fi was attacked on Monday, resulting in the theft of approximately $6 million in DAI. On-chain security companies Blockaid, PeckShield, and CertiK subsequently disclosed the anomaly, stating that their teams have suspended the affected contracts but have not yet announced compensation arrangements.

Price within the Flash Loan Twisted Pool

The core of this attack was to distort the liquidity of the vault pool by using large flash loans. The attackers used approximately $65.4 million in flash loans to target a vault pool named LazyVault_LowerRisk_USDC.

The product was originally positioned as a low-risk strategy vault, with risk management handled by Block Analitica. During the attack, an algorithm malfunctioned within the pool, causing the displayed annualized yield to briefly surge to approximately 2.08 million. The attackers then exploited this price distortion to quickly withdraw user funds.

The main losses were concentrated in LVUSDC

PeckShield stated that the primary affected entity is Summer.fi's LVUSDC vault. On-chain data shows that one of the largest related addresses appears to be linked to Torben Jorgensen, co-founder of the Web3 company UDHC.

  • The flash loan amounted to approximately $65.4 million.
  • Approximately $6 million in assets were transferred out of DAI.
  • The abnormal annualized rate once rose to approximately 2.08 million%.

The report mentioned that the address deposited approximately 8.6 million USDC into the relevant pool shortly before the attack, subsequently becoming one of the biggest losers in the incident. The transferred DAI was quickly redeemed through the Uniswap V3 pool.

The agreement has encountered risk control issues multiple times in the past year.

This incident has also brought renewed market attention to the risks associated with Summer.fi's multi-chain infrastructure. The protocol currently covers Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum. Over the past year, the protocol has experienced withdrawal freezes due to USDX de-pegging and narrowly escaped attack related to rsETH.

In addition, the team had previously intercepted a malicious governance proposal that attempted to influence the protocol by exploiting legacy access permissions. This latest wave of attacks comes at a time when the overall security situation in the DeFi industry remains tense.

According to data cited in the article, by the beginning of the third quarter of 2026, the DeFi sector had suffered losses of more than $840 million due to cyberattacks, with losses exceeding $640 million in April alone.

Tip
$0
Like
0
Save
0
Views 488
HKWDB reminds readers to view blockchain rationally, stay aware of risks, and beware of virtual token issuance and speculation. All content on this site represents market information or related viewpoints only and does not constitute any form of investment advice. If you find sensitive content, please click“Report”,and we will handle it promptly。
Submit
Comment 0
Hot
Latest
No comments yet. Be the first!
Related
CFTC Chairman Says Binance Hacker Attack Indicates That Offshore Exchanges Need US Regulation
Michael Selliger, chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), stated that the $6.4 billion hack incident at Binance “precisely demonstrates” the necessity of the crypto market regulations proposed by the agency this month. He described the attack as being more likely caused by a vulnerability introduced through a laptop rather than a flaw in the blockchain itself; however, Binance later indicated that the investigation had uncovered “more entry points” for the attack.
Decrypt
·2026-10-31 23:10:23
9
Intel experiences its largest single-day decline in over forty years; the NASDAQ falls nearly 3%, gold drops to a one-year low, and crude oil continues to rise for four months in a row.
Amazon and Intel's financial reports disappointed the market. Investors are increasingly skeptical about the returns on the huge AI expenditures of these tech giants. All three major U.S. stock indices closed lower, with tech stocks leading the decline, while energy and essential consumer goods sectors performed strongly against the trend. Driven by the Middle East situation, crude oil prices rose to a six-month high; U.S. Treasury yields fell, gold dropped to a one-year low, and Bitcoin lost its support below $77,000.
Wallstreetcn
·2026-10-31 22:30:06
24
I went on vacation with two iPhone, and Duo convinced me to do so.
The author tried out Apple's new iPhone Duo during a five-day vacation. Initially, due to application issues, Touch ID, and the camera, among other factors, they considered returning to their original iPhone. However, by the end of the trip, they changed their mind, finding that although this foldable phone has its shortcomings, it is indeed fascinating.
TechCrunch
·2026-10-31 22:21:57
27
Neuberger Next Generation Connectivity Fund Announces an Increase in Allocation Rate and Reveals the Monthly Allocation for Next Month
Neuberger Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc. (NYSE : NBXG) announces a distribution of $0.132 per common share, to be paid on November 30, 2026, with the record date and ex-dividend date both set for November 16, 2026. The fund states that under its actively managed distribution policy, future monthly distributions are expected to be $0.132 per share, but whether this can be maintained depends on market conditions, investment returns, capital gains, and expenses, among other factors.
PR Newswire
·2026-10-31 22:21:54
27
After Binance was attacked by hackers, how should investors protect the security of their crypto assets?
On October 29, Binance was attacked by hackers, with an estimated loss of $6.3 billion, which has drawn external attention to the recovery of stolen funds, the exchange's compensation commitments, and the lack of a similar deposit insurance protection mechanism for crypto assets like FDIC. Experts say that whether an exchange compensates usually depends on its own willingness and financial capability, and while self-hosting by individuals can reduce some platform risks, it also brings new security hazards.
CNBC
·2026-10-31 22:11:08
32
View More