M (M)Price Live Chart, Prediction, Market Cap, Token Unlocks, M Concept Stocks HKWDB

BTC

$63,192.01

+0.14%

/M Price

No.62

$1.1129

+2.00%

≈$1.11

Market Cap

$5.93B

Cir. Cap

$1.41B

Cir. Supply

1.26B

Cir. Rate

23.7148%

Total Supply

5.33B

Max Supply

10B

24h Volume

$8.48M

24h Vol (BTC)

9.23M

24h Turnover

0.656291%

Market Share

0.07%

Performance

Low

1.07

Range

+0.04%

High

1.12

Listing

$0.07

ATH (2025-07-03)

$4.85

-77.05%

ATL (2025-09-18)

$0.001

+111185.7%

Official

Contract

BSC: 0x22b1...c731fa

Official

Whitepaper

github

Social

Discord

Network

Converter

Chart

Market

About

Price

Cap

K-line

Depth

1 Minute

5 Minutes

15 Minutes

1 Hour

4 Hours

1 Day

TradingView

+1.61%

24H

+2%

-15.39%

30D

-17.86%

+202.52%

All

+1.49K%

AI Assistant

M下跌原因

M资金流向

M买卖支撑位

M多空比分析

M趋势分析

Ask AI

M Market

CEX Spot

CEX Derivatives

Pairs

#	Exchange	Pairs	Price	+2%Depth	-2%Depth	Volume (24h)
1	BingX	MUSDT	1.09199	$884.68	$192.11	25,609
2	gate.io	MUSDT	1.0919	$884.68	$192.11	43,924
3	Bitget	MUSDT	1.091921	$884.68	$192.11	69,604
4	MEXC Global	MUSDT	1.09205	$884.68	$192.11	72,730
5	Hotbit	MUSDT	1.08518	$884.68	$192.11	717,284

5 items

Rows

#	Unlock Date	Unlock Amount	Unlock Value	Total Supply %	Unlock Details
1	2026/08/03	56.11M	$62.44M	1.12%	4
2	2026/09/03	56.11M	$62.44M	1.12%	4
3	2026/10/03	56.11M	$62.44M	1.12%	4
4	2026/11/03	56.11M	$62.44M	1.12%	4
5	2026/12/03	56.11M	$62.44M	1.12%	4

About M

MemeCore is the first Layer 1 blockchain, built for Meme 2.0 — a new paradigm where meme coins transcend speculation to become engines of culture, value, and community coordination. In this new era, memes are not just content — they are currency, governance, and creative expression.

73%

26%

Bullish

Bearish

Community

Abu Talks Crypto

6m ago

The script is as dramatic as Hollywood: > Team HoodRat releases content about a new NFT and announces that $HOODRAT holders will receive WL slots. > Matt Furie posts about HoodRat. > OpenSea retweets the post. > Token price surges from 500k to 9M market cap. > Matt Furie deletes the post. > Price crashes to 1.5M. > Team orchestrates the scenario of Matt Furie's account being hacked. > Users lose funds. > Developers and hackers split the loot.

450

Bitcoin News

1h ago

The actions of some people in this world are outrageous. A victim had nearly 30 bitcoins stolen from a cold card, 17 of which were converted to Ethereum via @THORChain and then deposited into @Duelcomcasino. The victim and a researcher emailed all known addresses of @Duelcomcasino, requesting the funds be frozen and providing all transaction and deposit information. Downstream from the victim's approximately 30 bitcoins in the cold card, the hackers deposited 229,724,972,550 Ethereum (approximately $445,000) into this suspicious offshore casino. Despite Duel's anti-money laundering policy claiming they conduct KYC verification and comply with all relevant laws, Duel's response was to tell the victim to report it to the police. This response is infuriating. It is now past midnight in most of the Western world. Police reports will not be received until at least Monday. These criminals refused to freeze funds that have been confirmed to originate from a cyberattack. If they do not freeze the funds, they are accomplices in the theft. They received notification within minutes of the deposit being completed. If Duel doesn't freeze this money, they will face serious legal action. Duel's X account has been suspended, so I'm tagging anyone we can find who is associated with them (team members, resellers, and others). Let these people know they have to do the right thing. @korraflow @atrois7 @MiaMalkova

475

Mr. Ideal Thirty Years (🌸,🍃)(FREE,WON)

1h ago

I, the "God of War" with 10U, have reopened my long position in SPCXUSD1 today. At 20x leverage, I'm currently slightly profitable, having made a few dollars. However, this time I'm not just looking at a single SpaceX long position. I traded a Nasdaq stock price exposure, and the settlement code is now solana:USD1ttGY1N17NEEHLmELoaybftRBUSErhqYiQzvEmuB //////////////////////////// SPCXUSD1 is Binance's first stock perpetual trade settled in USD1. The underlying asset is SpaceX, supporting up to 25x leverage, and it's available 24/7. Previously, USD1 was used in trading crypto assets like BTC and ETH; now it's expanding into equity assets. From Crypto to TradFi, it may seem like just adding another trading pair, but behind it lies a significant expansion of the usage boundaries of $USD1. /////////////////////////// Currently, USD1 has a market capitalization of approximately $4 billion, placing it among the top mainstream stablecoins. Market capitalization is certainly important for stablecoins. But what I'm more concerned about is how many real transaction chains it's actually being integrated into. Spot trading, collateral, crypto perpetual bonds, and even stock perpetual bonds like SPCX. Each additional asset class adds another layer of trading and settlement demands surrounding USD1. /////////////////////////// So, I'm certainly concerned about how much profit this deal can generate. But I also want to continue observing whether Binance will integrate more stocks, ETFs, or even other TradFi assets into the USD1 settlement system in the future. Stablecoins truly became infrastructure, and this is roughly how they gradually expanded. High-leverage contracts are risky; I only participate with small positions. Be careful to control leverage. (DYOR)

373

Niner 🍡九儿🔶

2h ago

On the BSC chain, there's a "space dog war" going on, with different developers each sending out one. Are they really that impressed by this IP? While the stock-based pooling and dividend model is indeed viable, it's also possible to use coins as pools for dividends. We'll see if this model can be sustained. Interestingly, $MAME is also a tax-based coin with dividends, and a bunch of people are mocking it, saying it's outdated and still using tax-based coins. Now, anything with taxes is considered innovative, which is great. $Koma is determined to go against me. Every time I mention it, it crashes. Now everyone's suing me, saying I caused the crash. I'm upset too; my account has been halved, and I even opened a long position. The trend was good, I don't know why it crashed now. Actually, if it had gone up, the big players would have profited more. Now I've noticed many big players are testing the waters. This time I really don't dare say anything. I'll secretly open a small position and wait until I close it before speaking out, otherwise I'll become the one being sued. It's rare to find market opportunities in a bear market. Just seize the opportunity to make a small profit.

318

Vegetables are not vegetables

3h ago

I'm really fed up with this Twitter account. A few days ago, everyone was bullish on BTC when it was hovering around 64,000, saying it was going to rebound. Yesterday it dropped 2,000 points, but today the sentiment has completely changed, and everyone is expecting it to drop one last time.

347

实力技术瓜

4h ago

ETH remains in a wedge pattern. The price has pulled back slightly in the short term, but it's still near support. If the price is strong, it might rebound to test the 1935-1950 resistance level. If it's weak, it might go directly down. My original plan was to go long and then short, but it's too late to go long, so I'm currently holding no positions and waiting for an opportunity.

300

实力技术瓜

5h ago

BTC has been trading within a channel in the short term. The price retraced to the support level and held, indicating that the lower support line is quite strong. I originally planned to look for an opportunity to go long near the support level, but it was too late, so I didn't enter the market. I'm currently holding no positions and waiting for an opportunity to trade.

330

Crypto Welfare Bro

6h ago

August started off well. One 4x gain was bought after seeing Ethereum expert Zhang's tweet, and the other was a low-market-cap coin I immediately bought after CZ announced his intention to buy Meme. Day n of my challenge to earn 100 BNB from 1 BNB. I tried copy trading, but lost even faster; I also tried high-intensity trading, but lost more than I gained—neither is suitable for an average person like me. It's very difficult for ordinary people to make money on Meme; treat it as a hobby. After all, I'm not a professional. Sell immediately when you make a profit, and sell immediately when you lose. As long as you don't lose everything, you can keep playing, but getting rich is impossible.

483

Araki from the Crypto World | 🪵

6h ago

Trump's suspension of a new round of military strikes against Iran has provided temporary relief to the market. As long as tensions in the Strait of Hormuz ease, oil prices and inflation expectations have a chance to cool, and the external pressure on US stocks, semiconductors, and Bitcoin will be less. However, I believe that geopolitical risks are only temporarily loosening their grip on the market. Next week, the real determinant of whether funds will return to stocks will be whether companies can produce decent data. Therefore, next week I'm more interested in seeing the earnings reports from SpaceX and AMD after the market closes on August 4th, rather than how much Bitcoin fluctuated over the weekend. I hold $SPCX and also have semiconductor positions. SpaceX needs to prove that Starlink can support its revenue and cash flow, and AMD needs to prove that the demand for AI servers has truly translated into orders. I don't think Wall Street is pessimistic about AI; they're just unwilling to endlessly pay for empty promises. SpaceX's rocket story is big enough, but after its IPO, we need to look at its capital expenditures and profitability. AMD's growth cannot rely solely on industry expectations; AI chip shipments, data center revenue, and guidance for the next quarter are key. Now the market is scrutinizing the accounts; how much was spent and how much was ultimately earned must be clearly explained. If the US-Iran tensions continue to de-escalate, and SpaceX and AMD both provide strong growth and stable guidance, recent market concerns about a slowdown in AI hardware demand may ease, and semiconductors, memory, and Bitcoin could potentially recover. However, if geopolitical tensions resurface, or if the two companies provide weak guidance, the market will likely continue to compress AI valuations. These are the two key themes to watch next week.

415

andrew chen

7h ago

We're now moving away from testing LLMs by things like "creating an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle." To get a more comprehensive understanding, I was curious what Opus 5 would do if I gave it the first paragraph of text from *The Lord of the Rings*, a budget of 1 million tokens (about $10), and asked it to render three JavaScript versions. Opus ran for about two hours, writing 5,500 lines of code (procedurally) to render the story. It was a bit rough, but interesting. It's truly incredible that an LLM could actually manage to place and coordinate various polygon assets in (x, y, z) coordinates, write code to animate them, and ultimately accomplish all that. I also love these kinds of examples because a normal person simply wouldn't spend the time writing such custom code, but LLM (game developers) have endless energy and patience, so it shows how our thinking has shifted from "nobody would do this" to "of course, it's free anyway." There are probably many more examples like this. But I'm excited to create highly customized worlds where you can imagine placing players, for example, letting them participate in the Lord of the Rings story as NPCs or characters, and so on. Like a timed version of Grand Theft Auto X that you can experience anytime. Finally, the world/game domain exposed a weakness of LLM: they can't easily review their own work because they can't efficiently natively perceive videos or play games within videos. For example, Opus 5 had to very slowly and laboriously take screenshots at different points in time, resulting in several errors and many flaws in the footage. This is an example of a rudimentary capability (multi-mode, gameplay) that I think is still quite lacking.

483